I definitely understand the model does not contain the images. You gave a very valid description for probably the most critical copyright issue around it at th

I definitely understand the model does not contain the images. You gave a very valid description for probably the most critical copyright issue around it at the moment. I'd say my point is more around the fact that the content will have different legal standing depending on whether or not something produced by the model is considered a traded good or a private creative work using some tools. Copyright and likeness rights is only one area this impacts, but is a solid example. If the content is considered traded, then likeness is not allowed. If it is a private work created through use of a tool, then it is fine as long as it isn't traded or publicly displayed. My argument is that since the model is heavily influenced by its training, and the user did not train the model, that a trade is happening. The untrained model is the tool, but a trained model is now like a commodity and everything it produces is also a traded item. Does this argument make sense?