4 ms·
The story wasn't just "not 100% factual," it was substantively misleading. For example: A huge part of the story was about 12 and 13 year old kids that Daisy
by dbecker 15y ago
The story wasn't just "not 100% factual," it was substantively misleading.
For example: A huge part of the story was about 12 and 13 year old kids that Daisy met at the factory gates. He says he saw lots of them, and he suggests that this is the norm. Other reports suggest this is very rare.
The story isn't true using the conventional definition of true... and it isn't true even using Daisy's theatrical definition of true.