4 ms·

I assumed everyone understood that the monologue was part fabrication. It fit together so well that it couldn't have happened as it was told. Frankly i'm surpri

by Joeri 15y ago

I assumed everyone understood that the monologue was part fabrication. It fit together so well that it couldn't have happened as it was told. Frankly i'm surprised at the outrage. I thought it was masterful storytelling that pointed out a genuine problem. I don't care if it's not 100% factual.

Steko 15y ago
"not 100% factual" ia an interesting way to spin "completely fabricated and slanderous"
dbecker 15y ago
The story wasn't just "not 100% factual," it was substantively misleading. For example: A huge part of the story was about 12 and 13 year old kids that Daisy met at the factory gates. He says he saw lots of them, and he suggests that this is the norm. Other reports suggest this is very rare. The story isn't true using the conventional definition of true... and it isn't true even using Daisy's theatrical definition of true.