3 ms·
Sure, they were told back in 2020 they were being investigated for this, updating their boilerplate for compliance with the law is just about the minimal level
by zerocrates 3y ago
Sure, they were told back in 2020 they were being investigated for this, updating their boilerplate for compliance with the law is just about the minimal level of compliance.
- sokoloff 3y agoCompliance with the law seems like a fairly binary thing. They (as argued) weren't and now they are. Do you have a specific way in mind that they should become more compliant?
- burkaman 3y agoUpdating the job postings addresses "SpaceX routinely discouraged asylees and refugees from applying", but does not mean they have resolved the other half: "refused to hire or consider them".
- deelowe 3y agoIt does not mean they failed to address it either... This is pure speculation and irrelevant.
- zerocrates 3y agoI'm just saying that if you're going to say you comply you'll at least update those kinds of statements. You can't claim at all to comply if you're still saying "citizens and green card holders only." That could easily be a veneer of compliance, where you're still rejecting all those similarly situated candidates, or rejecting them at comparatively higher rates, but just doing so without explicitly stating their status as the reason. That would be much harder to prove but not actually complying with the law.