4 ms·
I disagree. You can’t dictate which tools someone should [not] use to amplify fantasy if it doesn’t affect you. Tbh that “right to fantasy ends at the border of
by wruza 3y ago
I disagree. You can’t dictate which tools someone should [not] use to amplify fantasy if it doesn’t affect you. Tbh that “right to fantasy ends at the border of their skull” sounds too oppressive to appeal to ethics.
- joker_minmax 3y agoIt absolutely would affect you if that imagery is disseminated through any means capable of being seen by anyone you ever know or meet. It is oppressive because it requires you to allow others to exist with the same right. To me this is a facet of the right to privacy.
- wruza 3y agoSo distribution is what affects you and that is wrong, I agree with that.