>The other challenge for cameras is that, unlike lidar, which has its own light source, they rely on ambient light. That’s why they often struggle at night or i

>The other challenge for cameras is that, unlike lidar, which has its own light source, they rely on ambient light. That’s why they often struggle at night or in bad weather. They were testing to disprove the idea it doesn't need ambient light. It's 'worst case scenario / point making testing' not realistic real world testing. Also I'm not sure I see how you're deducing 'very cherry picked' data there. They've given a range of situations and some general results that look pretty good. I'd assume it's cherry picked in as much as it's not a full data set, but it doesn't exactly yell suspiciously missing anything core to me. Are you expecting the system to fall apart in light rain, but excel in heavy?