3 ms·

You seem to have the mistaken opinion I'm arguing for a particular outcome. My point is simple: you can't say RSA is crap because an admin failed. I'm not sayin

You seem to have the mistaken opinion I'm arguing for a particular outcome. My point is simple: you can't say RSA is crap because an admin failed. I'm not saying anything else. If you are reading something else into my statement, stop it. If you have information that is relevant to why you shouldn't trust the ciphers from RSA, dish it up. Like I said, I'd love to read it. It is possible to point out a logical phalacy while having no beliefs (or, in fact, deep knowledge [or, perhaps, religion?]) regarding what the phalacy pertains to.

tptacek 15y ago
No, I'm asking you to take a subject you're obviously engaged in and spend a couple minutes researching it before you write your next comment about it. Not to be a jerk, but because (a) the whole thread would benefit and (b) I can vouch, for you, that this is worth your time as a software developer to do. So: up for it? Is a couple minutes of Google time and the direct attention from several software security experts to learn lots and lots about key derivation functions and password hashes worth it to you?