I would argue the issue I'd how companies that make open source wants to gave the cake and eat it too. Essentially, because the software is so close to the com

I would argue the issue I'd how companies that make open source wants to gave the cake and eat it too. Essentially, because the software is so close to the company it's hard to be certain that the project is independent, sure you can fork it but look at what it did to openelastic. Not much. Instead if it's maintained by a foundation then it's much harder for a company to assert full control. It doesn't solve freeloaders but it's I think a big reason for freeloaders existing.