5 ms·
China and South Korea are making a big fuss about it, despite producing and releasing more tritium than Japan. Just a few minutes ago, The CPC (Communist Party
by Prickle 3y ago
China and South Korea are making a big fuss about it, despite producing and releasing more tritium than Japan.
Just a few minutes ago, The CPC (Communist Party of China) stated that it is suspending all imports of Japanese seafood to protect consumers.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-asia-66599189 https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-asia-66599189
> As expected, China has imposed a blanket ban on all Japanese seafood.
> Beijing announced some restrictions last month, but they were limited to 10 prefectures in Japan, including Fukushima and Tokyo. Earlier this week, Hong Kong announced a similar 10 prefecture ban on ‘aquatic produce’.
> South Korea, too, still blocks seafood imports from the Fukushima area. It's a ban that's been in place since 2013 and, although the government's political stance has softened, it is one that it has no intention of lifting.
> These are major customers for Japan and represent a lot of lost business. Nowhere buys more Japanese seafood than mainland China, which imported more than $600m worth last year. Remarkably, Hong Kong is only just behind - spending $520m on marine produce from Japan.
> Given China's consistent and vocal opposition to the wastewater release, it's a scenario that Japan's government probably envisaged. In the short-term, it admits businesses will take a 'significant' hit.
> In this sense, China understands the economic leverage it has over Japan and the question is whether Hong Kong will follow the mainland’s lead with another all-out ban.
> Either way, we're talking about major disruption for Japan's seafood industry and for restaurants in Hong Kong and China.
- colordrops 3y agoGood, the oceanic ecosystem is being destroying by fishing.
- kortilla 3y agoChina will just illegally fish it itself
- killjoywashere 3y agoThat is definitely true.
- sooheon 3y agoSource for claim that South Korea releases more than Japan?
- fomine3 3y agohttps://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100521833.pdf https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100521833.pdf
- Prickle 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_of_radioactive_water_of_the_Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Data_on_concentrations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_of_radioactive_water... Annual release of tritium: 2020: South Korea Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant and others Total: 365tbq or 1,022mg The total amount currently stored at Fukushima is around 860tbq, intended to be released over the course of 30 years. So divide by 30 and that is around ~28tbq a year. Either way, the halflife of tritium is around 14years, and it's everywhere in the ocean. This is actually a nothing burger.
- sooheon 3y agoWhy does this only compare tritium, which is the supposedly safe material? What about "cesium, cobalt, lithium, and strontium" which are supposedly more dangerous?
- Prickle 3y agoBecause it is filtered out by every nuclear power plant that has an inkling of basic morals? The only materials that aren't filtered out are Carbon14 and Tritium, if I remember correctly.
- sooheon 3y agoI never expect morals from large agencies. Have they allowed independent testing at the release point for the more dangerous isotopes?