3 ms·
Nate's actual conviction was for fraud and money laundering, not insider trading... yet they keep framing it as an insider trading conviction when it has absolu
by j0hnyl 3y ago
Nate's actual conviction was for fraud and money laundering, not insider trading... yet they keep framing it as an insider trading conviction when it has absolutely no bearing here. The guy did some sketchy stuff at a privately held company. Normally being fired would be enough, but he's clearly being made an example of, and a poor one at that when the DOJ is completely sleeping on folks running multi-million dollar grifts.
- cirrus3 3y agoSo what? Fraud and money laundering are illegal too. Make him an example, who cares. Just because the coverage of it frames it a certain way or that other people are doing worse things doesn't move me at all.
- j0hnyl 3y agoThe DOJ itself is framing it as Insider Trading, even when that's not what they charged him with. It's disingenuous and fear mongering.