I am obviously not argueing this case in court here, and expecting the same standard from random HN commentors is not reasonable. The basic facts from my previo

I am obviously not argueing this case in court here, and expecting the same standard from random HN commentors is not reasonable. The basic facts from my previous comment are accurate and have been widely reported for a long time, and it's pretty clear what's intended. Trying to nitpick on the exact language as some form of "rebuke" is not exactly constructive.