6 ms·
Bilateral, you say? SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute): Countries with an increase in stockpiled nuclear warheads from Jan 2022 to Jan 20
by tpmx 3y ago
Bilateral, you say?
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute): Countries with an increase in stockpiled nuclear warheads from Jan 2022 to Jan 2023:
China: +60
Russia: +12
Pakistan: +5
North Korea: +5
India: +4
https://www.statista.com/chart/30173/the-countries-expanding-their-nuclear-arsenal/ https://www.statista.com/chart/30173/the-countries-expanding...
- vkou 3y agoThe UK, France, China, and Israel are more than an order of magnitude under the US and Russia in their nuclear armament, and Pakistan, India, and NK are another order below them.
- gizajob 3y agoThere's also the number actually in use - the UK has four nuclear submarines, one of which is always at sea, so can only ever really launch 1/4 of it's armament. The rest will be sitting somewhere when the big day comes, never to be used.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- waffleiron 3y agoThis would be a more interesting statistic with the full stockpile amount. Now it seems misleading, as if the US and Russia don’t have vastly more nukes than the others.
- mulmen 3y agoWith MAD does it matter? Isn’t the idea that if anyone launches nukes everyone launches nukes?
- vkou 3y agoThere's MAD and there's MAD. Nobody is going to invade NK, because even a few nukes make it a horrible idea, but I also don't consider NK launching it's weapons to be a fundamental, serious threat to global civilization.
- waffleiron 3y agoWe don't truly have MAD with someone who has a small amount of nuclear weapons. Specifically one of the reasons the US dropped out of the ABM treaty was because they argued that they should be able to defend against countries with a small amount of nuclear weapons. It's also unlikely that everyone else launches their nukes during MAD, it's a doctrine that specifically applies to an attacker and a defender.