> I would be surprised if they didn’t have specific example of them clearly being aware of that information and choosing not to act. Yeah, I'm sure the FBI nee

> I would be surprised if they didn’t have specific example of them clearly being aware of that information and choosing not to act. Yeah, I'm sure the FBI needed to bring out their top detectives to find "evidence" that the Tornado Cash devs where not aware that criminals used their service. I guess they never googled themselves or talked to anyone ever. This case isn't a dispute about the facts. It's a fight about if existing AML legislation can be stretched to include new types of financial actors on blockchains. Most people here simply have no idea how Tornado Cash operated, don't care to ask themselves what the underlying principles should be, what kinds of obligations should be in miners, and would probably support the arrest of Vitalik Buterin on money laundering charges.