Oh so it wasn't what was IN the article, but rather that there was an article? In the page you've linked (I had seen it but thank you!) The grugq mentions that

Oh so it wasn't what was IN the article, but rather that there was an article? In the page you've linked (I had seen it but thank you!) The grugq mentions that it 'wasn't what he thought it was' so did Andy Greenberg write something malicious? Because he surely would have known that talking about his dealings with the US and trashing Russian and Chinese marketplaces would have had a bed effect. But then again he DID say it was a big mistake of his. I am definitely overanalyzing it, but I appreciate your help!