4 ms·
The ideal interface would be a WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean) word processor like app that let you edit the markup visually, but using a semantic repre
by joshmarinacci 3y ago
The ideal interface would be a WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean) word processor like app that let you edit the markup visually, but using a semantic representation rather than strict WYSIWYG. Thus you can write without having to know too much of the syntax, but still be producing strict markup. I recall such editors existing about 20 years ago. I guess the market for XML tool died.
- chrisweekly 3y agoYou just described Obsidian. Its UX atop .md files is simply amazing.
- d4mi3n 3y agoLogseq is another contender in this vertical: https://logseq.com/ https://logseq.com/
- teleforce 3y agoFor maths and scientific publications with WYSIWYG approach check TeXmacs: https://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/home/welcome.en.html https://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/home/welcome.en.html Please note that despite the name it has nothing to do with TeX or Emacs.