3 ms·
Yeah, he likely meant "Nature" requires a mechanism of action.
by redavni 3y ago
Yeah, he likely meant "Nature" requires a mechanism of action.
- lovvtide 3y agoEven if that is what he meant, I still don't think it's correct. To speak of a "mechanism of action" is necessarily to speak about a model of Nature that you, an observer, have created. Natural phenomena exist empirically and logically prior to any such model, thus is is metaphysically redundant to say that Nature as such requires a mechanism of action.