4 ms·
When was that? Surely it must have been at least a decade before the GTX 970 "4GB" but maybe after all the driver cheating in the late 90s and early 2000s. I n
by beebeepka 3y ago
When was that? Surely it must have been at least a decade before the GTX 970 "4GB" but maybe after all the driver cheating in the late 90s and early 2000s.
I no longer buy nvidia hardware but I do enjoy stock price getting higher. I just wish I had the sense to buy more, a lot more, stock when it was much cheaper. How does a chicken shit like me make big money :(
- grouchomarx 3y agoIt's a tough game. Gotta have the guts to get in and stay in
- wmf 3y agoThe 970 was amazing for gaming; the 3.5GB problem was just for CUDA.
- wincy 3y agoI literally just replaced my GTX 970 a week ago. Fantastic GPU, lasted me a good ten years. Baldur's Gate 3 finally got me to update it, which it could run it but I dunno a new game got me excited. It ran Elden Ring just fine last year though.
- jules22 3y ago10 year GPUs would be the norm from here onwards.
- paulmd 3y agoThe tantrum over 970 has gotten even sillier since Microsoft used exactly this same bus structure (with fast/slow segments) on the Xbox series X and S. That’s a product designed and manufactured by AMD, eight?
- wmf 3y agoIt would be consistent to complain about both, although games have to be specifically ported to Xbox so they can work around hardware quirks. And I would give the blame to MS since they control the high-level design.