5 ms·
Mostly “training” to do abstract things, not really for survival or fun. I could catch fish since a fairly early age, mostly because I enjoyed it. At about ag
by ChatGTP 3y ago
Mostly “training” to do abstract things, not really for survival or fun.
I could catch fish since a fairly early age, mostly because I enjoyed it.
At about age 12 I used to drive stolen cars around without any training at all except observation.
It too me decades to become a corporate robot though :)
I think training is a weird word, life is an experience, not just training. I think your comment demonstrated the limitations of language to describe things.
- BlueTemplar 3y agoWe are pre-trained by billions of years of evolution.
- ChatGTP 3y agoTo use a fishing rod and drive a car ?
- Kerb_ 3y agoTo have the social and physical capabilities to create and pass on the concepts of "fishing rod" and "car" as well as how to use them. We did start from scratch, after all. But I think the learning of simple, complex, abstract, and nuanced concepts throughout a person's development as their brain grows is more than enough to compare to an artificial general intelligence without taking into account development of a species, considering we're the ones building the chips the AI is running on.
- ChatGTP 3y agoNothing starts from scratch...
- Sohcahtoa82 3y agoThis is true. People think newborn babies know nothing. But even from birth, there are certain instincts and skills they already know, such as the ability to recognize faces. Heck, our ability to think, analyze, etc. has come from hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. Even dogs, which we consider to be intelligent, often fail at simple tasks like trying to bring a stick through a doorway when the stick is wider than the doorway. Sure, sometimes they figure it out, but not all can.