7 ms·
- your critique is both vague, but at the same time touches a sensitive area, implying a wrongdoing by the tool authors that can't be refuted or fixed easily. W
by UweSchmidt 3y ago
- your critique is both vague, but at the same time touches a sensitive area, implying a wrongdoing by the tool authors that can't be refuted or fixed easily. What specifically bothers you? Consider that active Twitter discussions uncover and point out troublesome issues almost faster than the general public can understand and digest.
- assuming you found an egregious issue, do you also double down on maintaining that the tool is 'deliberately designed to make negative uses easy'? How so?
- I disagree with the 'safety catches' metaphor and would offer the 'hammer' metaphor instead.
- Actually, with the rapid development in this field I expect that anyone will be able to locally prompt for any content, even movies, soon, limited only by people's taste and imagination; with this realization I don't think I will follow up on this discussion that will surely be outdated in a minute.
- upwardbound 3y agoPeritract already called out a specific issue. The male and female options come with different sets of selectable poses, and some of the female poses are pornographic in nature. This promotes the objectification of women.