3 ms·
That antitrust != monopoly. That is it. Do I also need to add that antitrust != collusion? I am not even really arguing that they are guilty in this case. I
by taeric 3y ago
That antitrust != monopoly. That is it. Do I also need to add that antitrust != collusion?
I am not even really arguing that they are guilty in this case. I flat out don't know. I do find it odd to see the unwavering defense of Apple in this.
- scarface_74 3y agoNo one is defending Apple. I’m pushing back against the silliness of the armchair lawyers on HN that say Apple must be a monopolist even though a real judge in the Epic vs Apple case said otherwise.
- taeric 3y agoI'll grant that is probably more valid for a larger portion of the discourse here than I realize. Doesn't feel relevant to my points, though.