2 ms·
I should note that the company was private about this, and didn’t mention it anywhere. Someone asked what they’re selling, which I couldn’t respond to since it’
by gorenb 3y ago
I should note that the company was private about this, and didn’t mention it anywhere. Someone asked what they’re selling, which I couldn’t respond to since it’s dead, but they’re trying to sell an API, which is basically what was open source but it requires internet and costs money.
- klaaz0r 3y agoFrom a business perspective I understand closing it but building OSS and taking it private does feel a little weird?
- KRAKRISMOTT 3y agoIt's a web scraping tool that requires constant daily maintenance. I don't think they get enough third party contributors to justify keeping it open source. I bet most users are just there to raise issues whenever something breaks.
- klaaz0r 3y agoLooking at the git history they did get decent amount of contributions they are of course completely free todo this but it does feel a little like profit from OSS and take it private once you have enough
- PeterisP 3y agoThey're not "of course completely free todo this" unless they have permission or copyright transfer from every single contributor. They don't solely own full copyright to the combined product, they have been licensed these contributions under GPL, if they want to distribute the combined product (their own code + contributions) they either have to follow the licence conditions or it's a copyright violation.