4 ms·
> Thanks to our advanced AI algorithms, you won’t tell generated humans from real people If the images posted are the best they can do, then i have some bad ne
by dvngnt_ 3y ago
> Thanks to our advanced AI algorithms, you won’t tell generated humans from real people
If the images posted are the best they can do, then i have some bad news from them
- function_seven 3y agoI can count on one hand the number of ways these photos fail. That's right, 6 ways.
- nocman 3y agoCount Rugen sees no problem with this.
- function_seven 3y agoEh. On one hand, I guess it's no problem at all. But on the other hand...
- paint 3y agoIf you encode a binary digit for each biological digit on your hand you can count up to 32 on one hand.
- lambdasquirrel 3y agoNono, these AI improvements mean that we can do 64 now!
- permo-w 3y agoand there are more than two clearly distinct ways to articulate a finger, so you can bump that up to at least 3^5, not that it would be in any way convenient or useful to do so assuming you have the dexterity to hold each of your 10 fingers in one of 3 different positions—e.g.: up, down and crooked—you could technically count up to 3^10 or 59,049 if you mastered that, you could add a fourth or even fifth position. 4^10 is just over 10^6, so you could hold any 6 digits, and 5^10 is just under 10^7, so almost any 7 digits you can compress really heavily using high bases, but for it to make practical sense the atomic medium of storage has to have that number of states if you just convert binary to a high base and back again, unsurprisingly the space used works out exactly the same, as the number of symbols used to represent a number may be fewer, but the length of the symbols themselves balances it out exactly e.g. in base 1000 you may be able to represent the number 999 with a single symbol, but you need 1000 unique symbols to show every number up to 999, each of which of course takes up significantly more digits than a bit; however, if you had a storage cell that could reliably store and display 1000 unique states, then it would be a different matter. whether that's possible or would/could even take up less physical space than ~log_2(1000) binary cells I do not know
- RheingoldRiver 3y agoOnly 31 right? 16 + 8 + 4 + 2 + 1
- permo-w 3y agoup to 31, but 32 numbers in total
- albert_e 3y agoThe first image i generated was worse than that A mermaid with plastic looking skin, and badly rendered ocean water in background. https://generated.photos/human-generator/64d6dde03af7f90007cb64f9 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64d6dde03af7f90007c...
- irrational 3y agoLooks as realistic as every other real mermaid I’ve seen ;-)
- klyrs 3y agoI got exactly that image too! I guess the "random human" isn't so random. This calls their "real time" claim into question...
- meepmorp 3y agoIt nailed the pose, though.
- wredue 3y agoThe first photo generated for me made everything look plastic. Unnatural sharp lines on everything. Shadows from 5 different directions. It’s laughable to call these “hyperrealistic”.
- sdflhasjd 3y agoMarketing taking it too far as usual. They certainly have mastered peak uncanny valley though, I'm not really sure what this is useful for.
- PeterisP 3y agoIn the second photo I rolled, the generated human had legs that ended in hands instead of feet.
- astrobe_ 3y agoThe demo pictures have this sort of "uncanny valley" effect for me. I wonder if it happens when I don't know that the pictures are AI-generated.