4 ms·
I can’t tell if this article is AI generated or just sloppily written. The organization is really weird. There are just two (very specific) subheadings in the p
by kn0where 3y ago
I can’t tell if this article is AI generated or just sloppily written. The organization is really weird. There are just two (very specific) subheadings in the piece: “Bunny Bear Booster Seat (1933)” and “In the 1970s Car Hammocks for Babies Were a Thing (1970s)”, but these sections discuss multiple different car seat designs besides the title ones, making me think these “sections” were LLM-generated.
None of the photos are specific to the sections of the article they appear in—it’s as if the author just did a google image search for “old car seat” and sprinkled them throughout the article with no particular chronological or contextual significance.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dfxm12 3y agoIt reads like an AI generated article. There also doesn't appear to be a by line. The site has a contact form, but no one is named in the contact us or about us page. To me, this points more to AI generated than sloppily written.
- Terr_ 3y agoIt is kinda weird: It'd be one thing if it was simply an unordered list of photos, but the text seems like it was randomly interspersed too.
- Aardwolf 3y agoI didn't read it, just enjoyed scrolling through the photos. It's at least awesome that such a collection of photos exists of a topic that would otherwise certainly be entirely forgotten. Do you think archeologists might still be able to find this series of photos in, say, 500 years?
- moribvndvs 3y agoI mean, I just google image searched “historical car baby seat” and all those photos showed up, almost in the same order as the article. To answer your question, if Google is still around, yes.