> because it's in excess of the 3000 limit that this law actually puts in place, and therefore de jure illegal. I don't get it, do you not understand the diffe

> because it's in excess of the 3000 limit that this law actually puts in place, and therefore de jure illegal. I don't get it, do you not understand the difference between possessing a certain amount of cash and making a single payment over a certain amount in cash? How do you make a logical leap from the latter to the former?