2 ms·
What's your point? I literally said "renewable hydrocarbons will be a better alternative". I'm saying that hydrogen is a bad option, but if e.g. this renewable
by Qwertious 3y ago
What's your point? I literally said "renewable hydrocarbons will be a better alternative".
I'm saying that hydrogen is a bad option, but if e.g. this renewable propane turns out to cost $1000/litre then hydrogen wins by default. It wouldn't be that surprising, current synthfuel is expensive AF. And this new headline hasn't been commercialized yet, so it might not be viable after all.
The benefit of hydrogen fuel is that, while it works poorly, it does work and is already in use today, in e.g. forklifts. It was in use decades ago, in fact. It's boring and low-risk, if we can't find anything good.