> Aren't most serious languages designed for large code bases? Maybe the big companies like Google and Facebook are approaching a new meaning of a “large codeb

> Aren't most serious languages designed for large code bases? Maybe the big companies like Google and Facebook are approaching a new meaning of a “large codebase”. They have a huge number of programmers, the development is much more distributed into different locations and time zones, and the release cycles are much smaller than they used to be with large codebases in the past. There’s for example this very interesting discussion about the way these companies use their versioning systems: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3548824 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3548824 Some of the practices (like keeping their whole codebase in one big repository) look quite questionable, if not downright stupid from a smaller viewpoint, but make sense in their case. Go could be a similar thing – most serious languages are designed with good modularization, encapsulation and other features that support large scale code bases as most of us know them, but that does not mean these languages are a great match for software at the Google scale.