3 ms·
It's true that we don't have the pricing on the main site, and I agree that this should be added. However, that issue might affect signups — but signups don't
by ManuelKiessling 3y ago
It's true that we don't have the pricing on the main site, and I agree that this should be added.
However, that issue might affect signups — but signups don't seem to be the dealbreaker, as we have, as of this writing, a total of 1,059 fully signed up users (fully signed up == they went to the double opt-in process and verified their mail address).
These users are confronted with pricing as soon as they are required to pay — that is, as soon as they've translated more than 5 minutes of video, and thus need to buy additional translation minutes.
Which precisely 1 (one!) user has done so far...
- MaKey 3y agoNot being able to see pricing without signup would be a deal breaker for me.
- gremlinsinc 3y agoI'd have transparent pricing, and some sort of free tier where user gets maybe 2 minute max size videos, 2x per month and maybe can only translate to one other language. Then have a $10 tier for x total minutes of video per month, $35, and $60 tier.
- cpncrunch 3y agoWell, I think you are putting off many serious users by not having pricing, so you may be left with the "tire kickers". And are you giving infinite videos for free if they don't need translation? I would suspect most users wouldn't need the translation, so you might be giving too much for free. It should probably be limited to something like 10 mins for free (Loom gives 5 mins free, but if you give a bit more, that is a competitive advantage). Then, I would suggest offering payment per video (or, have credits, where 1 credit is 15 mins or something) as well as the subscription, and allow people to upgrade to the sub later. Maybe also have a self hosted version.