These are the studies we have. Disregarding evidence that we have because it doesn't follow some specific parameter that you care about means that you are valui

These are the studies we have. Disregarding evidence that we have because it doesn't follow some specific parameter that you care about means that you are valuing your experience more than studies. By default, why are you assuming that screens for under 2-year-olds are good? What is your evidence here? We have a lot of evidence that it's bad, maybe it's not perfect evidence, but since we don't _any_ evidence to the contrary, it seems bad faith to believe otherwise or intellectual laziness.