2 ms·
Scheme would probably be better than Common Lisp -- the design of the language encourages functional programming more. If nothing else, naming functions that mu
by silentbicycle 18y ago
Scheme would probably be better than Common Lisp -- the design of the language encourages functional programming more. If nothing else, naming functions that mutate state with !s (e.g. set-cdr!) seems like a good convention: it doesn't twist your arm, but it reminds you in a way that stands out.
- apgwoz 18y agoI couldn't agree more. By referring to "LISP," I meant the general family of languages, but really meant Scheme (which I use). Edit: What am I even saying? I didn't mention LISP, it was a quote.