>release what was supposed to be open as a free beta to fix bugs >release its more powerful brother as a subscription nased service >heavily nerf both >relea

>release what was supposed to be open as a free beta to fix bugs >release its more powerful brother as a subscription nased service >heavily nerf both >release fine tuning to maybe make the nerfed gpt 3.5 as good as it was at launch but only if you finetune it well enough >keep the unnerfed version for internal use at microsoft >profit I mean at least Google is honest about it, they have the best product, you won't get it because it's more valuable as an internal tool than public, sure announce Bard after gpt launches to not have your stocks go down but it's bad and even then will probably never launch. At least meta made their nerfed version opensource. I legit was a beast with the gpt 4 of a couple months ago, now I'm back to a 1 man developer, using it now makes me waste time more than gain it, since I have to fix its errors, might as well do it myself... so I can see how you don't want to give it to others. If your reply is going to be something obviously wrong like "it wasn't nerfed" then just don't waste your time man...