3 ms·
I always thought it was Independent Disks, though how one disk could be dependent on another is beyond me. Perhaps the I is redundant?
by askvictor 3y ago
I always thought it was Independent Disks, though how one disk could be dependent on another is beyond me. Perhaps the I is redundant?
- quickthrower2 3y agoLooking it up I think you are right. I thought it was inexpensive.
- throw0101b 3y agoThe original Patterson, Gibson, Katz paper has "Inexpensive": * https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garth/RAIDpaper/Patterson88.pdf https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garth/RAIDpaper/Patterson88.pdf * https://www.computerhistory.org/storageengine/u-c-berkeley-paper-catalyses-interest-in-raid/ https://www.computerhistory.org/storageengine/u-c-berkeley-p...