4 ms·
> their reviews are complete black boxes They are certainly not "complete black boxes". This page [0], for example, explains in detail their test procedure for
by tethys 3y ago
> their reviews are complete black boxes
They are certainly not "complete black boxes". This page [0], for example, explains in detail their test procedure for vacuum cleaners.
Just an excerpt on durability testing (via deepl):
> Impact test (500 cycles): The hoovers drive over thresholds 10 000 times and bump into posts 1 000 times.
> Drop test: The suction nozzle must survive 1 200 drops from a height of 80 centimetres.
> Cable pull-out test: 6 000 pulls.
> Test of hose attachments: 40 000 swings with the connection nozzle clamped.
> Squeezing the pipes, hoses and auxiliary air adjusters: The testers load them with about 70 kilograms for ten seconds.
[0]: https://www.test.de/Staubsauger-im-Test-1838262-1838266/ https://www.test.de/Staubsauger-im-Test-1838262-1838266/
- Semaphor 3y agoThat is one of the better ones, most (or at least anything I ever looked at) have far shorter and less detailed "so testen wir" sections. But I guess complete blackbox is incorrect. I’d still want actual data in most cases.
- cgeier 3y agoI would presume they are doing it on purpose, so that industry doesn't optimize for their tests when they develop their next product.