> [...] I don't think they're worried about competition taking the models anyway, there's nothing particularly special about the weights or training data, just

> [...] I don't think they're worried about competition taking the models anyway, there's nothing particularly special about the weights or training data, just the compute If that is the case, then what do you suppose is the reason most researcher outfits stopped releasing model weights, or offer more restrictions when they do? Using the GPL won't prevent the larger AI competitors from using your model outputs from tuning their non-public models to consistently beat yours, but a non-commercial clause does. > Also, LLaMA has a more permissive license than this translation one, and is a more powerful model, so I don't really see the "homing missiles to open AI" angle. LLaMa lags ChatGPT 4, but SeamlessM4T is ahead of WhisperX in some ways