I confused what you were referring to, but I think it works with either adnauseum or copyright. I'm not sure what your definition of terrorism is. It sounds li

I confused what you were referring to, but I think it works with either adnauseum or copyright. I'm not sure what your definition of terrorism is. It sounds like it's defined as stealing resources from someone else? The definition of terrorism is not very defined, but I would think it generally means to cause fear in the general public for political gains. Maybe the general public can be replaced by an ad network theft induces fear, but then I think we're on vague territory. I think for me the main point is just that harm can be justified for good and bad reasons, so we have to discuss how it's harmful and why it's justified or vice versa, rather than just saying it's harmful therefore bad. In general I'm for "harming" businesses that I believe are actively harming society. I would be more on the side of trying to target their incentives rather than any individual person though. Sanctions, penalties and tax disincentives supposedly do this.