3 ms·
For those that don't know, there are many wonderful incremental backup solutions that don't require ZFS. * For one, I personally recommend Restic (https://resti
by xpe 3y ago
For those that don't know, there are many wonderful incremental backup solutions that don't require ZFS. * For one, I personally recommend Restic (https://restic.net https://restic.net) because of its deduplication.
* People on macOS don't have ZFS, well... maybe they could? See https://github.com/spl/zfs-on-mac https://github.com/spl/zfs-on-mac
- chromakode 3y agobupstash.io was my favored option other than ZFS. It's a beautiful and performant solution. Being filesystem agnostic is an advantage in many contexts. In the end I chose ZFS for the efficiency of snapshots (vs. a full disk scan) and atomicity. Both enable more frequent, smaller syncs, which is perfect for a laptop.
- drexlspivey 3y agomacOS Time machine does incremental backups, is there any other reason wou might need ZFS?