3 ms·

By the time you can see the slightly denser smoke, you're stuck in traffic headed towards the fire, no?

by 8note 3y ago

michaelmrose 3y ago
In the absence of outside input the people who decided to move almost all lived because collectively they all decided to go somewhere not full of fire. People that drove a mile in the wrong direction are still already in a car moving and able to change direction and cover substantial ground quickly. The same person who waited half an hour doing nothing is already fire adjacent and the roads just can't possible handle the thoughtput of getting everyone out simultaneously in the 3 minutes between now and when your kids are cinders whereas the roads could have handled it over the half an hour they sat on their hands.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- someplaceguy 3y ago
  > In the absence of outside input [...] People that drove a mile in the wrong direction are still already in a car moving and able to change direction and cover substantial ground quickly. In the absence of outside input, driving can just as easily be more dangerous than staying where you are. I'll quote this from the Wikipedia article of the June 2017 wildfires in Portugal: > The majority of deaths took place in the Pedrógão Grande municipality, when a fire swept across a road filled with evacuees escaping in their cars. > 47 people died in or near their cars when a fire overtook the area; 30 people died while trapped in their vehicles while the other 17 died nearby trying to escape on foot. It is suspected that they could have died from smoke inhalation rather than from the subsequent burn. But it is clear that many, if not all of them, could have survived if they hadn't tried to escape by car, because those who didn't try to escape did survive, and many of the houses were actually unaffected. But yes, it could have easily been the opposite, as it happened in the same wildfire on another municipality. And I would say it's quite possible that, in the absence of outside input, trying to escape by car could give you the greatest chances of surviving in most circumstances. But I'm not an expert so I really can't say that for sure. And I'm sure it would also depend on the geography, the roads, and where the fire is.
dylan604 3y ago
This also sounds like suggestions made by people that have never been to the specific area being discussed, and assuming things based on experience where they are located. The roads in Hawaii are not high speed in any sense of the word. It took me a couple of hours to get from Lahaina to the airport on the one trip I have taken there. This is typical, as the group I was was with were regulars there and knew to leave hours in advance. The roads are 2 lanes with one in either direction. One of the streets was so close to the ocean, the larger waves were lapping onto the street. Even during that trip, I was thinking to myself that this is not a place I would want to be trying to a make an emergency trip by car.

By the time you can see the slightly denser smoke, you're stuck in traffic headed towards the fire, no?

by 8note 3y ago

By the time you can see the slightly denser smoke, you're stuck in traffic headed towards the fire, no?

In the absence of outside input the people who decided to move almost all lived because collectively they all decided to go somewhere not full of fire. People that drove a mile in the wrong direction are still already in a car moving and able to change direction and cover substantial ground quickly. The same person who waited half an hour doing nothing is already fire adjacent and the roads just can't possible handle the thoughtput of getting everyone out simultaneously in the 3 minutes between now and when your kids are cinders whereas the roads could have handled it over the half an hour they sat on their hands.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
someplaceguy 3y ago
> In the absence of outside input [...] People that drove a mile in the wrong direction are still already in a car moving and able to change direction and cover substantial ground quickly. In the absence of outside input, driving can just as easily be more dangerous than staying where you are. I'll quote this from the Wikipedia article of the June 2017 wildfires in Portugal: > The majority of deaths took place in the Pedrógão Grande municipality, when a fire swept across a road filled with evacuees escaping in their cars. > 47 people died in or near their cars when a fire overtook the area; 30 people died while trapped in their vehicles while the other 17 died nearby trying to escape on foot. It is suspected that they could have died from smoke inhalation rather than from the subsequent burn. But it is clear that many, if not all of them, could have survived if they hadn't tried to escape by car, because those who didn't try to escape did survive, and many of the houses were actually unaffected. But yes, it could have easily been the opposite, as it happened in the same wildfire on another municipality. And I would say it's quite possible that, in the absence of outside input, trying to escape by car could give you the greatest chances of surviving in most circumstances. But I'm not an expert so I really can't say that for sure. And I'm sure it would also depend on the geography, the roads, and where the fire is.

dylan604 3y ago

This also sounds like suggestions made by people that have never been to the specific area being discussed, and assuming things based on experience where they are located. The roads in Hawaii are not high speed in any sense of the word. It took me a couple of hours to get from Lahaina to the airport on the one trip I have taken there. This is typical, as the group I was was with were regulars there and knew to leave hours in advance. The roads are 2 lanes with one in either direction. One of the streets was so close to the ocean, the larger waves were lapping onto the street. Even during that trip, I was thinking to myself that this is not a place I would want to be trying to a make an emergency trip by car.