9 ms·
It was never more than marketing for "identity theft protection". When you put it like that, it starts to sound an awful lot like paying a protection racket doe
by Vicinity9635 3y ago
It was never more than marketing for "identity theft protection". When you put it like that, it starts to sound an awful lot like paying a protection racket doesn't it?
- emodendroket 3y agoThat's ancillary; the biggest thing is offloading liability that would sensibly lie with the institution that lent money to a fictitious version of you.