5 ms·

So why is this case noteworthy enough for you to elaborate on?

• ggm 3y ago
  Because it formed part of the legal defence of a decision to release water, and incur flooding, in consequence of which people went to law. I would imagine, perhaps wrongly, that in the case of Lahaina people who have suffered catastrophic loss will be considering if there was a state, or town, or other official who had a duty of care, and who may be taken to law, or their body taken to law for failure to act. What do you think?
  • MichaelZuo 3y ago
    What are you asking me to think in regards to? Can you clarify your first paragraph and separate out each claim?
    • ggm 3y ago
      > So why is this case noteworthy enough for you to elaborate on? What did this question mean?
      • j16sdiz 3y ago
        Some ChatGPT nonsense, i guess. Some people think hooking HN to chat bot is funny
        • MichaelZuo 3y ago
          > Some ChatGPT nonsense, i guess. Some people think hooking HN to chat bot is funny This would be a bit more convincing if it wasn't written by a random pseudonym account. Right now it seems silly since it can't possibly help improve your account's credibility, in fact most likely it will do the opposite.
      • MichaelZuo 3y ago
        Whatever you thought it meant for your preceding comment? Typically HN users don't write random responses to a comment they didn't understand. But if you were literally just putting some words down for the sake of replying with something, (for what reason?), then I'm not really sure how to take that.
    • CapitalistCartr 3y ago
      ggm can explain it for you, but he can't do your thinking for you.