3 ms·
You're not describing semver, you're describing traditional feature-based versioning, which I agree is nice. This is semver: > Remove some obscure feature whi
by kdmccormick 3y ago
You're not describing semver, you're describing traditional feature-based versioning, which I agree is nice.
This is semver:
> Remove some obscure feature which almost nobody ever used? Backward incompatible change, must increment major version.
> Add some major new feature which is a massive quantity of code, visible and likely important to all users–but 100% backward compatible? Increment minor version instead.
- JohnFen 3y agoAh, OK. I'm using "semver" in the way I was taught it meant, but I'm totally willing to change.