3 ms·
I did not argue that it was inert. I actually argued that 1.) not really doing what enthusiasts claimed it was specifically doing. 2.) making people become dev
by jules22 3y ago
I did not argue that it was inert. I actually argued that
1.) not really doing what enthusiasts claimed it was specifically doing.
2.) making people become develop bizarre beliefs and generally become irrational.
It can be a cult pseudoscience while not being inert.
- jules22 3y agofixing terrible writing 1.) meditation was not really always doing what enthusiasts claimed it was doing. 2.) it was making people develop bizarre beliefs and generally become irrational.