3 ms·
> Has anyone successfully bypassed the current Ai detectors using fine-tuned models? Current AI detectors are pure garbage. Anybody paying for one is getting
by Sohcahtoa82 3y ago
> Has anyone successfully bypassed the current Ai detectors using fine-tuned models?
Current AI detectors are pure garbage. Anybody paying for one is getting scammed. Anybody using one to actually make decisions is making a grave error.
It's a real shame that some schools are using AI detectors to detect students using ChatGPT to write essays for them, because there have been many cases where the detectors flag essays as being AI-generated that are clearly written by hand.
All it takes is half an hour of playing with ChatGPT and asking it to write essays to understand ChatGPT's writing style. Yeah, with some decent prompting, you can get it to write in other styles, but let's be honest, anybody using ChatGPT to do their homework isn't typically putting in the effort to make it not look like ChatGPT.
- zarzavat 3y agoIt’s also completely impossible to detect “centaur” works which are a joint effort by human and computer. Where do you even draw the line? I use LLMs when I write as a tool to help me generate new ideas and find better word choices. If I were a student I would want to use the hell out of this, it really takes the drudgery out of writing.
- CMCDragonkai 3y agoThey shouldn't draw the line. To do so is to basically become Amish. Fine if you like that lifestyle, but not if you're trying to teach the next generation. Human augmentation is the future.
- tempaccount420 3y agoI wouldn't be surprised if students will soon adopt the style of ChatGPT, say because they're using it to learn English, or just talking to it a lot.