3 ms·
This one seems to be a deal-breaker, if you already know what types of language you want, why would you want openai moderating your parameter tuning set.
by htrp 3y ago
This one seems to be a deal-breaker, if you already know what types of language you want, why would you want openai moderating your parameter tuning set.
- thethimble 3y agoThis way they can ensure their safety/alignment mechanisms don’t get undermined with third party training data.
- Havoc 3y agoWhy do you care at all, let alone "dealbreaker". You need a model specifically fine tuned towards something dangerous?
- read_if_gay_ 3y agowhy do you care about privacy? i have nothing to hide why do you care about free speech? i have nothing to say
- CSMastermind 3y agoWe've already seen problems from that system where they try to enforce copyright (prevent the model from generating copyrighted materials). I've also encountered the content moderation system when summarizing a book on Islam and I still don't know what triggered it, I certainly wasn't asking it anything offensive. The message was able to regenerate with no problem. I think generally people are opposed to content restrictions outside of their control being placed on the system they're paying for.
- callalex 3y agoDangerous to who/what? Moderating is always opinion based.
- bratbag 3y agoI need a model where I get to define what is dangerous, without someone else thought policing.
- matheusmoreira 3y agoI want a "pure" model trained with every piece of information humanity has ever created. Absolutely no exceptions of any kind and especially none of this arbitrary political "fine tuning". Calling it "dangerous" only makes me want it more.