4 ms·
That's because HN has since removed referral headers on links, to work around this specific kind of blockage.
by AceJohnny2 3y ago
That's because HN has since removed referral headers on links, to work around this specific kind of blockage.
- kelnos 3y agoHm, strange, HN seems to set referrer-policy to 'origin', which seems like it should send a referer header when going to external sites[0]? But clearly it does not. So I guess I'm just misunderstanding how that header works. [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Re...
- yencabulator 3y agoLook at the link itself: <a href="https://asahilinux.org/support/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://asahilinux.org/support/</a>
- SushiHippie 3y agoLook at the 'a' HTML tag. <a href="https://rosenzweig.io/blog/first-conformant-m1-gpu-driver.html" rel="noreferrer">The first conformant M1 GPU driver<a>
- paulmd 3y agoAsahi and a few other websites blocked HN traffic (because of the aforementioned problems) and then HN added special nofollow/noreferrer for only these domains to prevent this. and then the sites responded with more assertive measures.
- throw10920 3y ago> assertive measures This is incorrect. These sites (or at least the Asahi one) are not being "assertive" - they are being hypocritical and toxic. Additionally, nobody has the right to selectively block links to their website. You get two options: you either let your site be publicly-viewable, with all the benefits and drawbacks, or you make it members-only and require a login. You can't have your cake and eat it too.