I in no way meant to smear, I asked for opinions. I find it personally very hard to judge the credibility of any content online these days. Also no, a PhD is ju

I in no way meant to smear, I asked for opinions. I find it personally very hard to judge the credibility of any content online these days. Also no, a PhD is just a title, nothing more. I would say when it comes to research, what matters (applicable in some fields) is transparency and reproducibility. The work often should speak for itself, regardless of any titles. Do you find the idea that there could be a PhD who would publish pseudo-science farfetched? Or what about someone without any title publishing a ground breaking paper? Reality is more complex than attended institution and acquired title. Still, I wasn't smearing anyone.