Fair enough, but I don’t see how this supports her thinking the internet was a fad not worth investing in. Also it denies agency to those in power in the decad

Fair enough, but I don’t see how this supports her thinking the internet was a fad not worth investing in. Also it denies agency to those in power in the decades that followed. I mean did that decision bind the policymakers that followed when it became clear how important the internet really was?