4 ms·
>I could live with not having iMessage So, literally any messaging app, something that non-Apple users have to do anyways, and have to deal with your bullshit
by ohgodplsno 3y ago
>I could live with not having iMessage
So, literally any messaging app, something that non-Apple users have to do anyways, and have to deal with your bullshit about only going through iMessage when they have to send you SMS.
>AirPlay
Chromecast is infinitely more ubiquitous. Also, if Apple didn't patent AirPlay and refuse to share it with anyone, you wouldn't be in this situation.
I will absolutely agree with Google being an absolutely dreadful steward of Android, but make no mistake: you gave Apple full support in locking themselves down in their own little playground, and now you're complaining you can't get out.
- sbuk 3y ago> Chromecast is infinitely more ubiquitous. Chromecast is a device. > Also, if Apple didn't patent AirPlay and refuse to share it with anyone, you wouldn't be in this situation. Google Cast is just as proprietary as AirPlay. Both require licensing to be included in devices. I have an LG TV that supports both, an ancient Roku device that does the same, as well as supporting Miracast. I suspect you're confusing Chromecast and the Google Cast protocol with Miracast, an open standard; one dropped by Google in favour of their proprietary stack.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- kalleboo 3y ago> Chromecast is a device It's branded as "Chromecast built-in" when supported by a TV, not "Google Cast". e.g. https://www.sony.com/image/89821bf64399cd4c34680e0988903e4b?fmt=png-alpha&wid=720 https://www.sony.com/image/89821bf64399cd4c34680e0988903e4b?...
- sbuk 3y agoIs that a recent rebranding? The SDK is still called Google Cast. https://developers.google.com/cast https://developers.google.com/cast.
- kalleboo 3y agoIt's probably a difference between developer facing and consumer facing, or software vs hardware branding. Or maybe they just couldn't get a trademark for "Cast"?