Wouldn’t the appearance of shutterstock’s mark suggest to the consumer that the provenance of the image was shutterstock, when it is not? But upon the absence

Wouldn’t the appearance of shutterstock’s mark suggest to the consumer that the provenance of the image was shutterstock, when it is not? But upon the absence of the mark, shutterstock would argue that the provenance of the image WAS shutterstock? I don’t think this is the salient feature of this phenomenon, but the proximity of these two arguments is interesting.