2 ms·

I truly don't see it on this one man, sorry. It's ok to read the mind of a commenter and dismiss their motivations as "fashionable to virtue signal" but not to

I truly don't see it on this one man, sorry. It's ok to read the mind of a commenter and dismiss their motivations as "fashionable to virtue signal" but not to point out that doing that is shitty? I am disputing the words of a comment that it's author chose to put there, but I am not attacking the author's character or motivations. This is a genuinely held opinion, not "flamebait" or w/e. Please help me understand what rule I violated here, because I truly cannot see it.

dang 3y ago
Of course it's not ok, which is why I scolded the GP. But responding to a provocation by breaking the site guidelines yourself ("This is such a shitty thing to say", "Is it beyond your comprehension", "Either speaks volumes about your own") is not also not ok. The primary point, however, is that this is a repeating pattern in the comments you post. It's not about one link or the other, it's about you breaking the site guidelines on a regular basis. If you keep doing that, we're going to have to ban you.