3 ms·
Is this legal? I would expect image libraries prohibit this type of usage in ther TOS. Why would they do all the hard work and then let someone else build a si
by TekMol 3y ago
Is this legal?
I would expect image libraries prohibit this type of usage in ther TOS. Why would they do all the hard work and then let someone else build a similar service on top of it?
Pixabay for example prohibits distributing their content "on a Standalone basis" which seems to be what you are doing when you offer to download the images:
https://pixabay.com/service/terms/ https://pixabay.com/service/terms/
- solardev 3y agoHow come Google and Bing get to do this?
- nnf 3y agoSame with the Pexels API. Their Terms & Conditions help page [1] and license page [2] state: > The Pexels License does not include: > > • the right to compile any Pexels Content to replicate a similar or competing Service; and > Don't redistribute or sell the photos and videos on other stock photo or wallpaper platforms. [1] https://help.pexels.com/hc/en-us/articles/900005880463-What-are-the-Terms-and-Conditions- https://help.pexels.com/hc/en-us/articles/900005880463-What-... [2] https://www.pexels.com/license/ https://www.pexels.com/license/
- 1xb3l 3y ago[dead]