4 ms·
Who knows how old this code is, but this page was developed with div's+css, which 4 didn't support (fully or not at all). It wasn't until later versions that di
by gunapologist99 3y ago
Who knows how old this code is, but this page was developed with div's+css, which 4 didn't support (fully or not at all). It wasn't until later versions that divs replaced tables for layout.[0]
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Navigator#Decline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Navigator#Decline
- kristopolous 3y agoNetscape had support for both of those. https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/old-software/web-browsers/netscape-communicator-4-01 https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/old-software/web-browsers/ne... It was lousy but your timeline is a little off. Divs not only go back further than that but in those days you could just invent tags and Netscape 4 would treat it like some container <Xyz> </xyz> would just default to some block of unknown type or purpose. Regardless divs are from html 3.2 https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/SPSD-html32-20180315/#div https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/SPSD-html32-20180315/#div Let me be clear on the CSS support here, It was buggy partial and lousy. I was stuck on that browser for 5 years at the time on Linux before Mozilla became good enough